Geological magazine . TidSill Conglomerate. 115 into a roclc which has some resemblance to the bottom, rocTc. (Theitalics are not Prof. Bonneys.) In the discussion which followed, Prof. Hughes pointed out, as theresult of his own mapping of the district, that Prof. Bonney hadmisapprehended the direction of the dip, having been misled by thevery deceptive appearance of the surface of the quarry, and hadmistaken the patches of conglomerate sticking to the face of thequarry for alternating beds of conglomerate and granitoidite. Hefurther stated that the conglomerate really dipped away from TwtHil

Geological magazine . TidSill Conglomerate. 115 into a roclc which has some resemblance to the bottom, rocTc. (Theitalics are not Prof. Bonneys.) In the discussion which followed, Prof. Hughes pointed out, as theresult of his own mapping of the district, that Prof. Bonney hadmisapprehended the direction of the dip, having been misled by thevery deceptive appearance of the surface of the quarry, and hadmistaken the patches of conglomerate sticking to the face of thequarry for alternating beds of conglomerate and granitoidite. Hefurther stated that the conglomerate really dipped away from TwtHil Stock Photo
Preview

Image details

Contributor:

The Reading Room / Alamy Stock Photo

Image ID:

2AM74K0

File size:

7.1 MB (232.1 KB Compressed download)

Releases:

Model - no | Property - noDo I need a release?

Dimensions:

2285 x 1093 px | 38.7 x 18.5 cm | 15.2 x 7.3 inches | 150dpi

More information:

This image is a public domain image, which means either that copyright has expired in the image or the copyright holder has waived their copyright. Alamy charges you a fee for access to the high resolution copy of the image.

This image could have imperfections as it’s either historical or reportage.

Geological magazine . TidSill Conglomerate. 115 into a roclc which has some resemblance to the bottom, rocTc. (Theitalics are not Prof. Bonneys.) In the discussion which followed, Prof. Hughes pointed out, as theresult of his own mapping of the district, that Prof. Bonney hadmisapprehended the direction of the dip, having been misled by thevery deceptive appearance of the surface of the quarry, and hadmistaken the patches of conglomerate sticking to the face of thequarry for alternating beds of conglomerate and granitoidite. Hefurther stated that the conglomerate really dipped away from TwtHill, passed up into brown sandstones on the S.S.E. rim of thequarry, and was the basement bed of the Cambrian, resting uponthe Pre-Cambrian granitoid axis, as indicated in his section drawnacross the same ridge nearer Bangor (Q. J, G. S. Dec. 5th, 1877).To make the matter perfectly clear, I give a ground-plan of thequarry (Fig. 1). Prof. Bonneys section, to which the description Fig. 1. (Ground Plan of Twt Hill Quarry.). WSW a. Granitoid rock. b. Twt Hill Quartz conglomerate. c. Brown sandstone. A B. Line of Prof. Bonneys section.C D. Line of Prof. Hughes section. above quoted applies, was taken along the line A B. The section(Fig. 2) is a copy of Prof. Bonneys, given in Q. J. G. S, vol. xxxv.p. 321, and is a reduced representation of the diagram exhibited at Fig. 2. Prof. Bonneys section. (A to B. Ground Plan.