. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. Which Shall It Be? CAST IRON BOILERS-FOOL ECONOMY (false ratings, fuel waste, danger of breakdowns, dealers' profits), OR KROESCHELL BOILERS-FUEL ECONOMY (honest ratings, safety, quick heat, no boiler pits, no dealers' profits). WHAT THE USERS SAY: Kroeschell versus Cast iron I have one of your new 1910 model Kroeschell Boilers, and same has proven very satisfactory. We have no trouble to keep temperatures In the coldest weather. We fire once or twice during the day and once at night and have had the best satisfaction I have ever experienced in a b

. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. Which Shall It Be? CAST IRON BOILERS-FOOL ECONOMY (false ratings, fuel waste, danger of breakdowns, dealers' profits), OR KROESCHELL BOILERS-FUEL ECONOMY (honest ratings, safety, quick heat, no boiler pits, no dealers' profits). WHAT THE USERS SAY: Kroeschell versus Cast iron I have one of your new 1910 model Kroeschell Boilers, and same has proven very satisfactory. We have no trouble to keep temperatures In the coldest weather. We fire once or twice during the day and once at night and have had the best satisfaction I have ever experienced in a b Stock Photo
Preview

Image details

Contributor:

Library Book Collection / Alamy Stock Photo

Image ID:

RRY1H5

File size:

7.1 MB (90.8 KB Compressed download)

Releases:

Model - no | Property - noDo I need a release?

Dimensions:

1839 x 1358 px | 31.1 x 23 cm | 12.3 x 9.1 inches | 150dpi

More information:

This image is a public domain image, which means either that copyright has expired in the image or the copyright holder has waived their copyright. Alamy charges you a fee for access to the high resolution copy of the image.

This image could have imperfections as it’s either historical or reportage.

. Florists' review [microform]. Floriculture. Which Shall It Be? CAST IRON BOILERS-FOOL ECONOMY (false ratings, fuel waste, danger of breakdowns, dealers' profits), OR KROESCHELL BOILERS-FUEL ECONOMY (honest ratings, safety, quick heat, no boiler pits, no dealers' profits). WHAT THE USERS SAY: Kroeschell versus Cast iron I have one of your new 1910 model Kroeschell Boilers, and same has proven very satisfactory. We have no trouble to keep temperatures In the coldest weather. We fire once or twice during the day and once at night and have had the best satisfaction I have ever experienced in a boiler. Formerly I had two cast iron boilers; one cracked, and I took both of these boilers out. My coal bill with the cast iron boilers ran from $195.00 to $207.00 per season during the past seven years. This year, with your boiler and soft coal, my coal bill was only $ia'5.00, and I still have some coal left. Your boiler is the best and cheapest on the market, not alone for the price, but also in fuel saving. I am very glad that you are so well known in Buffalo, N. Y. I have never heard anything but praise, in which 1 join heartily. Wishing you every success, I remain. Max Buehler, Forks, N. Y. NOT CAST IRON. NOT CAST IRON SEND FOR CATALOGUE WHAT THE USERS SAY: Cast Iron Boilers Waste Fuel The No. 4 KroeBohell Boiler is heating 10, 000 sq. ft. of glass-it would take care of 13, 000 sq. ft. easy. Have no trouble to keep temperature of 50 and 60 degrees in coldest weather. The Kroesoliell Boiler has given perfect satisfaction. We had two oast iron boilers which never did the work at their best when the greenhouses were new. According to our experience with the Kroescbell, we will save 20 to 25 per cent of fuel. HiLD Bko3., Lake Forest, 111. KROESCHELL BROS. CO., 444 W. Erie St, CHICAGO Mention Tbe Review when ym write. IMICO Hot Water Boilers Hade by ILLINOIS MALLEABLE IRON CO. 1801-1825 Diversey Boulevard CHICAGO Are noted for coal economy^ and fl^ood results g^enerally BIND FOR