. The photographic history of the Civil War : in ten volumes . Lewis Henry Little lukaSeptember in, 1SG2. O. B. Branch AntictamSeptember 17, 1S62.. Turner Ashby HarrisburgJune 0,1862. William E. Starke AntietamSeptember 17. 1802. James McIntoshPea Ridge March 17, 1S62. Charles S. Winder Cedar Mountain, August 9. 1862. Samuel Garland, Jr. South Mountain September 14. 1862. TABULAR STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONS IN THE UNION SERVICE Cavalry Heavy artilleryLight artillery. Engineers Sharpshooters.Infantry Totals . . Regiments 27261 13 4 2,144 2,494 Battalions 458913 60 126 Companies 7836 7 35 351 507

• Contributor: Reading Room 2020 / Alamy Stock Photo
• Image ID: 2CGKA8R
• File size: 7.2 MB (299.3 KB Compressed download)
• Releases: Model - no | Property - no
• Dimensions: 2477 x 1009 px | 41.9 x 17.1 cm | 16.5 x 6.7 inches | 150dpi

More information

This image is a public domain image, which means either that copyright has expired in the image or the copyright holder has waived their copyright. Alamy charges you a fee for access to the high resolution copy of the image.

This image could have imperfections as it’s either historical or reportage.

. The photographic history of the Civil War : in ten volumes . Lewis Henry Little lukaSeptember in, 1SG2. O. B. Branch AntictamSeptember 17, 1S62.. Turner Ashby HarrisburgJune 0, 1862. William E. Starke AntietamSeptember 17. 1802. James McIntoshPea Ridge March 17, 1S62. Charles S. Winder Cedar Mountain, August 9. 1862. Samuel Garland, Jr. South Mountain September 14. 1862. TABULAR STATEMENT OF ORGANIZATIONS IN THE UNION SERVICE Cavalry Heavy artilleryLight artillery. Engineers Sharpshooters.Infantry Totals . . Regiments 27261 13 4 2, 144 2, 494 Battalions 458913 60 126 Companies 7836 7 35 351 507 Batteries 432 432 SUMMARY OF ORGANIZATIONS IN THE CONFEDERATE ARMY Any attempt to present in statistical form the strength of the Confederate armies is manifestly impos-sible, as was explained by General Marcus J. Wright in his introductory chapter in Volume I of the Photo-graphic History. The same conditions also render futile any accurate comparison of the troops furnishedto the Confederate armies by the various states of the South. Nevertheless, by tabulating the variousorganizations and bearing in mind the limitations of the method