. Coastal and inlet processes numerical modeling system for Oregon Inlet, North Carolina. Coast changes; Coastal engineering; Hydrodynamics. Z 0 o MEASURED PROFILES (DATE SHOWN) CALCULATED PROFILES FEB 17 FEB 16 INITIAL PROFILE — FEB 16 FEB 17 FEB 18 FEB 19 FEB 20 v FEB 21. PRESTORM PROFILE 20 60 80 100 120 OFFSHORE DISTANCE. METERS 140 160 Figure 29. Comparison of calculated and measured beach profiles for Leadbetter Beach, California, 1980 initial profile (16 February 1980); the sand size; hourly values of signif- icant wave height, period, and direction; and hourly tide levels. Tidal fluc

- Image ID: REJKDJ
. Coastal and inlet processes numerical modeling system for Oregon Inlet, North Carolina. Coast changes; Coastal engineering; Hydrodynamics. Z 0 o MEASURED PROFILES (DATE SHOWN) CALCULATED PROFILES FEB 17 FEB 16 INITIAL PROFILE — FEB 16 FEB 17 FEB 18 FEB 19 FEB 20 v  FEB 21. PRESTORM PROFILE 20 60 80 100 120 OFFSHORE DISTANCE. METERS 140 160 Figure 29. Comparison of calculated and measured beach profiles for Leadbetter Beach, California, 1980 initial profile (16 February 1980); the sand size; hourly values of signif- icant wave height, period, and direction; and hourly tide levels. Tidal fluc Stock Photo
Enlarge
https://www.alamy.com/licenses-and-pricing/?v=1 https://www.alamy.com/coastal-and-inlet-processes-numerical-modeling-system-for-oregon-inlet-north-carolina-coast-changes-coastal-engineering-hydrodynamics-z-0-o-measured-profiles-date-shown-calculated-profiles-feb-17-feb-16-initial-profile-feb-16-feb-17-feb-18-feb-19-feb-20-v-feb-21-prestorm-profile-20-60-80-100-120-offshore-distance-meters-140-160-figure-29-comparison-of-calculated-and-measured-beach-profiles-for-leadbetter-beach-california-1980-initial-profile-16-february-1980-the-sand-size-hourly-values-of-signif-icant-wave-height-period-and-direction-and-hourly-tide-levels-tidal-fluc-image232750382.html
. Coastal and inlet processes numerical modeling system for Oregon Inlet, North Carolina. Coast changes; Coastal engineering; Hydrodynamics. Z 0 o MEASURED PROFILES (DATE SHOWN) CALCULATED PROFILES FEB 17 FEB 16 INITIAL PROFILE — FEB 16 FEB 17 FEB 18 FEB 19 FEB 20 v FEB 21. PRESTORM PROFILE 20 60 80 100 120 OFFSHORE DISTANCE. METERS 140 160 Figure 29. Comparison of calculated and measured beach profiles for Leadbetter Beach, California, 1980 initial profile (16 February 1980); the sand size; hourly values of signif- icant wave height, period, and direction; and hourly tide levels. Tidal fluc
The Book Worm / Alamy Stock Photo
Image ID: REJKDJ
This image is a public domain image, which means either that copyright has expired in the image or the copyright holder has waived their copyright. Alamy charges you a fee for access to the high resolution copy of the image.
. Coastal and inlet processes numerical modeling system for Oregon Inlet, North Carolina. Coast changes; Coastal engineering; Hydrodynamics. Z 0 o MEASURED PROFILES (DATE SHOWN) CALCULATED PROFILES FEB 17 FEB 16 INITIAL PROFILE — FEB 16 FEB 17 FEB 18 FEB 19 FEB 20 v \ FEB 21. PRESTORM PROFILE 20 60 80 100 120 OFFSHORE DISTANCE. METERS 140 160 Figure 29. Comparison of calculated and measured beach profiles for Leadbetter Beach, California, 1980 initial profile (16 February 1980); the sand size; hourly values of signif- icant wave height, period, and direction; and hourly tide levels. Tidal fluctuations played an important role in the mechanism of cross-shore trans- port (Swain and Houston 1984a). The sensitivity of the model to other important parameters is discussed elsewhere (Swain 1984). 83. A comparison has been made also between measured profile modifica- tion during the Currituck Sand-Bypass Study (Schwartz and Musialowski 1980) and the profile response model calculations. This study involved placement of 26,750 cu m of sediment on the coast near New River Inlet, North Carolina, using the split-hull dredge CURRITUCK. Since the dump area was relatively small, there were significant "end effects" so that the amount of sand in the 65. Please note that these images are extracted from scanned page images that may have been digitally enhanced for readability - coloration and appearance of these illustrations may not perfectly resemble the original work.. Vemulakonda, S. Rao; U. S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station. Vicksburg, Miss. : Dept. of the Army, Waterways Experiment Station, Corps of Engineers ; [Springfield, Va. : Available from National Technical Information Service]

Similar stock images